Monday, 2 October 2017

Advocacy - Amendment of definition of Deposit under Companies Rules

Availing Security Deposit to cover for non-payment by the buyer is a common practice in case of companies dealing with continuous supply of goods and services i.e. cellular services, electricity utilities, gas utilities, 2-3 years subscription, security deposit in case of medium term lease agreement, companies dealing with continuous contract for supply of goods, etc.
 
Section 2 (31) of the Companies Act, 2013 defines deposits as follows:

“deposit” includes any receipt of money by way of deposit or loan or in any other form by a company, but does not include such categories of amount as may be prescribed in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India;

Rule 2 (1) (c) (xii) of Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules, 2014 clarifies that an amount received in the normal course of business as an advance for the supply of goods and services accounted for in any manner whatsoever provided that such advance is appropriated against supply of goods or provision of services within a period of three hundred and sixty five days from the date of acceptance of such advance, shall not be treated as Deposit.

The Ministry vide Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Amendment Rules, 2016, further added that following advances also shall not be considered as Deposits:

·         “as an advance towards consideration for providing future services in the form of a warranty or maintenance contract as per written agreement or arrangement, if the period for providing such services does not exceed the period prevalent as per common business practice or five years, from the date of acceptance of such service whichever is less;

·        as an advance received and as allowed by any sectoral regulator or in accordance with directions of Central or State Government;

·         as an advance for subscription towards publication, whether in print or in electronic to be adjusted against receipt of such publications;"

This excluded the earnest money deposits, advance allowed by sectoral regulator and 2-3 years subscription to publications. However, it has not excluded security deposit taken by utilities although allowed by the spectral regulator and security deposit taken in continuous contracts.

In such case, a company accepting Security Deposit to secure against non-payment in case of continuous contracts of more than 365 days will have to consider the same as deposit and will have to abide by the provision of section 76 read with section 73 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013.

An accountant in me would immediately come out with a solution that it is better to adjust the security deposit against the account of such buyer on annual or six monthly basis so as to avoid it being considered as Deposit and avoid the additional compliances under the Companies Act. However, at the same time a tax guy in me warns that such a book entry adjustment for repayment of security deposit may lead to non-contravention to section 269T of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

In my humble opinion, considering the industry practice of taking security deposit to avoid non-payment in case of continuous contract, the Ministry may consider proposing an amendment to Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules in following manner:

"(iv) in sub-clause (xii),-

(f) as an advance or security deposit received and as allowed by any sectoral regulator or in accordance with directions of Central or State Government;

(g) ….

(h) as an security deposit in case of continuous contracts to be adjusted against non-payment by the buyer of goods or services."